“The Unhappy Sufferers”: Bostonians vs. Brits circa. 1770

Featured Image Source

Image 1: Excise Payment in Tar and Feathers

Image Source

Context: The caption reads “The Bostonians paying the excise-man or tarring & feathering”. This cartoon depicts a fiendish-looking group of Bostonians “paying their dues” to the British tax collector by tarring and feathering him. Tarring and feathering is the act of dousing someone in tar and feathers in an attempt to humiliate them. The Brit is also being forced to drink tea. Behind the mob stands a “liberty tree” with a “Stamp Act” poster on its trunk and a noose hanging from a branch. Out on the water is a recreation of the Boston Tea Party in which Bostonians threw tea overboard a British ship as a way to protest the Tea Act.

Image 2: “The Patriot’s copious Tears . . . which embalms the Dead”

Image Source

Context: This drawing shows a scene from the “Bloody Massacre”, also known as the “Boston Massacre”, in which British soldiers shot and killed multiple people after being harassed by a mob of civilians. This was during the British occupation in Boston. In the image, we see the British soldiers on the right attacking

Student Questions

  1. Who do you think the target audiences of these images are? Are they meant to be seen by the same or different demographics of people?
  2. What purpose do you think these images serve? Why might have been the authors motive in creating them?
  3. Put yourself in the perspective of a Bostonian during the 1770s. How might you respond to each of these images? Would your perspective change as a person living in Britain?

Instructional Goals and Model Answers

  • Students will be able to investigate an author’s purpose by analyzing the work created by that author in the context for which it was created.
  1. The target audiences for these images are different. Image 1 is meant to be seen by the British. This image shows the Bostonians as cruel people who do terrible things to the British because they don’t want to pay taxes. Image 2’s target audience are the people living in the colonies. The picture and accompanying description paint the British as uncaring people who are indifferent about killing the Bostonians.
  2. I think these images are meant to make the people within their targeted demographic angry and strengthen the biases they have about the opposite group of people. The colonists wanted support in their rebellion against the British while the British wanted those within Britain to support the decisions being made by them in the American colonies.
  3. As a Bostonian, both of these images would probably enrage me. The first image because it paints people like me in a bad light. The second image would also make me angry at the British for cruelly murdering people within my city. It may also inspire me to support the rebellion. As a British person, I would probably be disgusted by the images. Image 1 would make me upset and sick because it depicts someone like me being harassed by people going against the government I support. Image 2, however, might make me feel mixed things. If I already support the British troops, I’d probably be upset that the Bostonians depicted the soldiers in the way that they did. If I wasn’t sure about my stance on the colonies, I might start thinking negatively about the soldiers in the colonies.

Utter Destruction: The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Featured Image by Jordy Meow from Pixabay

Image 1: Anti-Japanese Propaganda

Image Source

Context: This propaganda poster was created by the U.S. Army to be seen by the American people during WWII.

Bias Icebreaker: What bias is this image trying to create in the viewer?

Expected Student Response: The caption in this poster makes me think that its goal is to instill hatred of the Japanese people in American citizens. The creator wants the viewer to create a bias toward the Japanese so that Americans would support the invasion of Japan during WWII.

Image 2: The Bomb’s Aftermath

Image Source

Context: This photo is a view of Hiroshima, taken after the bombing.

Caption Writer Icebreaker: Using what you know about the bombing of Hiroshima, how would you caption this photograph? Why?

Expected Student Response: The caption I would give this photo is “Hiroshima left devastated after the American bombing. How will they recover?”. I chose this caption because this photo shows the aftermath of the bombing. There is very little left of the city.

Image 3: Years Later

Image Source

Context: This photo is of an area affected by the bombing in Hiroshima.

Questioning Icebreaker: What questions do you have when looking at this photo?

Expected Student Response: How could the people of Hiroshima rebuild the city? What was this building before? What does Hiroshima look like now? Where was this building located? Did all of Hiroshima look like this?

Youth and Labor in the United States

Featured image by The New York Public Library.

As industrialization in the United States increased following the Civil War, it was common to find American children working outside of the home to earn wages for themselves or their families. Children worked in many different industries and represented much of the labor force. It was not until the 1930s that Child Labor laws would be enacted to protect the rights of young children in the US.

The Breaker Boys

The young boys in this image (courtesy of LOC) worked in coal mines in Kingston, Pennsylvania circa 1900.

The boys in the photo above are one example of popular employment for youth. These “breaker boys” spent their days sitting along a conveyor belt, “breaking” away the impurities within the coal atop the belt. Working within a coal mine was often dangerous and attributed to poor health of the workers.

What do you think it was like to work as a “breaker boy”?

Child Labor Standards

An advertisement by the US Department of Labor. Image courtesy of Records of Rights.

Beginning in the 1900s, groups of people started advocating for an end to child labor. Eventually, the Children’s Bureau enacted the Fair Labor Standards Act, making it illegal for children under the age of 16 to work full time.

What do you think drove the Children’s Bureau to make this decision?

What caused the shift from supporting child labor to advocating for education?

Unexpected Impacts

Image courtesy of LOC.

What can these newspaper articles tell us about some of the outcomes of this decision?

Discussion Questions:
1. How has the United States coped with these impacts?
2. How has the United States evolved since this time?
3. What changes, if any, have been made to the child labor laws?